World of Tanks Marksman Requirements

[MrBoJanglez84]

Did the marksman change? I thought it was 2-0.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

[CAG SILENT]

Did the marksman change? I thought it was 2-0.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

No marksman is still 2-0

1st Lieutenant
REAL RECOGNISES REAL

[MrBoJanglez84]

Ok. Expect 5 messages from me soon. After that, they're yours to do with as you please.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

[CAG JB]

Marksman- Destroy 2 vehicle's in a battle and survive.
or
Must have 1,000 damage hit points in a battle and survive.

This must be completed 5 time's in any two ways.

Must have a full CAG member who has been in the clan at least one Month.

Sharpshooter- Destroy 4 vehicle's in a battle and survive.
or
Must have 2,200 damage hit points in a battle and survive.

This must be completed 5 time's in any two ways.

Must have a full CAG member who has been in the clan at least one Month.

Expert- destroy 6 vehicle's in a battle and survive.
or
Must have 4,500 damage hit points in a battle and survive.

This must be completed 10 time's in any two ways.

Must have a full CAG member who has been in the clan at least one Month.


REAL RECOGNISES REAL

Is this the up to date requirements for awards on tanks?

Just asking as I can see me hitting these as the games thoroughly enjoyable

[XBigDaddyCrushX]

as far as i know those r the current reqs

[CAG SILENT]

Is this the up to date requirements for awards on tanks?

Just asking as I can see me hitting these as the games thoroughly enjoyable

Yes these are the finalize requirements for the medals.

[CAG JB]

Thanks fellas

[SprayAim]

Is this the up to date requirements for awards on tanks?

Just asking as I can see me hitting these as the games thoroughly enjoyable

they are up to date though i was debating dropping the damage option for the sake of simplification.... once we have more guys give their opinions ill make a final decision

[CAG SILENT]

they are up to date though i was debating dropping the damage option for the sake of simplification.... once we have more guys give their opinions ill make a final decision

I finalize it a long time ago why are you thinking of changing it now. The damage is in place as optional and like I brought up many times cause other players seal kills. So it make it harder to get kills. Plus other member's like Soul stood behind me on the requirements. I never stepped away from tanks so I think everything I put in place should stay that same out of respect for me.

[SprayAim]

I finalize it a long time ago why are you thinking of changing it now. The damage is and like I brought up many times plus other member's like Soul stood behind me on the requirements.

I am looking at it from a fresh perspective with no bias opinion. I can see that the damage option on a proficiency award along with a kill option can be too much to take in for new recruits.

We want to keep these awards as simple as possible, limiting them to kills will do just this as well as promote comms and teamwork

Yes, as a platoon commander you voiced your final opinion with a few others suggestions and agreements taken on board but since these awards were not implemented and made concrete it stands to reason that they can be tweaked for efficiency until that time comes

We now have more active members to call WoT their main game than ever before with many CAG members playing it as a secondary atop those numbers. Now is a great time to get this nailed down with a greater scope of input before the time comes that these medals are in fact applied to the site and made final

There is nothing to stop there being damage based awards in the future but proficiency medals from an objective view should be only kill based


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk