![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Nominations for Member of the Month go here, Winners will be announced at the end of the Month
I know this has possibly been brought up but what about a small group being in charge of this. Like one or two un biased reps from kilo and whiskey and few others to cover all other areas of CAG that way nominations of that company can be verified. I know we all try to branch out but it is tough to know who is always active outside the forum. With all of us being different timezones, games and platforms it could give eyes on the variety. Of course the group would have to be trust worthy loyal members/leaders. Just a thought and more could go into it. That was just a rough outline for the idea.
I do love the ideas so far as the nominations and kids suggestion.
P.s. sorry for any typos. It was all done on my phone
LordHavok (August 25th, 2014)
Nominations sounds better than open vote to me. As stated, it's not supposed to be a "contest" of popularity or renown. The question I'm having is with what kid said, what would be better: Nominations with open "Hell Fucking Yeah" to add, or a closed vote by the most high-ranking within the clan? Democracy is fine and dandy for most of the time, but there's always a risk it becomes about face and not value.
CAG JB (August 26th, 2014),LordHavok (August 26th, 2014),ScottyDntKnow (August 26th, 2014)
Lambda89 (August 26th, 2014),ScottyDntKnow (August 26th, 2014)
that sounds like a better idea...leave nominations open for 3 days or so, and the last week of the month have a poll up and have people vote anonymously
BIG COUNTRY (August 28th, 2014)